Almost one in four with restrictions of internet in the country have had a bad experience however, while nearly 14 percent have approached by a stranger seeking friendship with them. Researchers from the University of Oxford, analyzed interviews with 515 children between 12and 15 years a third of whom had restrictions rather than their use of the internet. They say that it is necessary to continue working to protect teenagers who can access the internet away from home withoutparental filters, through your mobile phone. Lead author Dr AndrewPrzybylski, from the Oxford Internet Institute, said: 'filters are good atsimple tasks like screening to swear, to be on the easy side, because it is text and child abuse where there is an existing database of images for comparison.' But a filter cannot know if a young person has metsomeone before allows them to start a chat on WhatsApp, or checkwhat share.' «The problem may be that the children may also view images on smartphone apps, which means the use of filters inside theHouse can be updated in a sense.» Children and parents need to bebetter educated about how to protect yourself online. ' the number of hours children spend online has increased from eight to about 19 hours a week during the 2015.Following a Daily Mail campaign, internet providers now have to install filters sex as an option by default. The study, published in the journal of Pediatrics, found internet filters could have a positive chilling effect on children, helping to keep themaway from inappropriate images since you anticipate results filteredby one same-censure what he sees. They are also less likely to have your personal information, but the filters were unexpectedly that theyhave been exposed to uncomfortable sexual content. In total, 42 of 108 children with filters at home had a bad experience online, or 22.2percent. This was higher than the 38 of 264 or 14.4 per cent without filters, supporting the conclusion that children may be viewing these images away from home. The study States: 'in fact, the availability ofmobile internet usage suggests that teens should be educated, supported and trusted devices with responsibility outside of the House.' the results surprised researchers, who expected that children with restricted internet access would have less 'dislike' a year of online experience. They were able to rule out a theory that children who had figured out how to circumvent filters would be likely to have bad experiences online. But research concludes that the effectiveness of internet filters is 'dubious', based on 1.030 home interviews with the children and their parents. Them researchers say that its main concern is that such filters can ' on-block' searches to get information about themes that are important for them adolescent, such as alcohol, drugs and relationships sexual. Dr. Przybylski said: ' parents can feel reassured knowing that they have internet filters in our home, but our results suggest that such filters prevent seeing things that may frighten or disturb them to young people.
'We firmly believe that there is a need for more evidence to providedirection to keep young people safe online authorities, parents and dealing of educating young people can support them in an appropriate manner'.
WHAT YOU ARE?
Children are seeing images in applications for smartphone, which means that the use of filters inside the House may be out of date.
The filters are good at simple tasks like screening to swear.
However, a filter cannot know if a young person has met someone before lets start a chat on WhatsApp, or see what is sharing. Filters canalso 'too block' searches for information about issues that are important to teens, such as alcohol, drugs and sex.
0 comments:
Post a Comment